Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Armstrong Blu-Trac PC Flex
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Blu-Trac PC Flex |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 7.7 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Blu-Trac PC Flex |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | C |
| Wet Grip | - | C |
| Noise Level | - dB | 70 dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Armstrong Blu-Trac PC Flex
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) against the Armstrong Blu-Trac PC Flex — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Armstrong Blu-Trac PC Flex achieves 7.7/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) holds a 2.3-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
10.0/10