Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Harvest King Field Pro All Purpose R-1
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Field Pro All Purpose R-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 7.6 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Field Pro All Purpose R-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Harvest King Field Pro All Purpose R-1
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) against the Harvest King Field Pro All Purpose R-1 — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Harvest King Field Pro All Purpose R-1 achieves 7.6/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) holds a 2.4-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
10.0/10