Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Winguard Winspike WH62 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 7.8 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 70.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 100.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 100.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Winguard Winspike WH62 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) against the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62 — both popular all-season / winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62 achieves 7.8/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) holds a 2.2-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) leads in: Dry Grip
- Tied in: Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 100.0/10 compared to 70.0/10 for the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
10.0/10