Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta CR3
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Hakkapeliitta CR3 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 90.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 80.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 100.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Hakkapeliitta CR3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta CR3
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) against the Nokian Hakkapeliitta CR3 — both popular all-season / winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Nokian Hakkapeliitta CR3 achieves 8.0/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) holds a 2.0-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) leads in: Dry Grip
- Tied in: Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 100.0/10 compared to 90.0/10 for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta CR3. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta CR3. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
10.0/10