Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Winda WP16
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | WP16 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 7.2 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 57.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 40.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 63.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | WP16 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | C |
| Wet Grip | - | B |
| Noise Level | - dB | 71 dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Winda WP16
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) against the Winda WP16 — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Winda WP16 achieves 7.2/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) holds a 2.8-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) leads in: Dry Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 100.0/10 compared to 57.0/10 for the Winda WP16. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 100.0/10 compared to 63.0/10 for the Winda WP16. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
10.0/10