Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) vs Nokian Rotiiva HT
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) | Rotiiva HT |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 90.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 70.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) | Rotiiva HT |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) vs Nokian Rotiiva HT
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) against the Nokian Rotiiva HT — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Nokian Rotiiva HT achieves 8.1/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) holds a 1.9-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) leads in: Treadwear
- Tied in: Dry Grip
In Dry Grip, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Nokian Rotiiva HT. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
In Treadwear, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) scores 100.0/10 compared to 70.0/10 for the Nokian Rotiiva HT. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear)
10.0/10