Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 vs Falken Azenis RT660
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Azenis RT660 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.4 | 7.7 |
| Dry Performance | 93.0 | 100.0 |
| Wet Performance | 93.0 | 58.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 90.0 | 73.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Azenis RT660 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 vs Falken Azenis RT660
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 against the Falken Azenis RT660 — both popular summer tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 9.4/10 overall, while the Falken Azenis RT660 achieves 7.7/10. The Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 holds a 1.7-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 leads in: Wet Grip, Treadwear
- Falken Azenis RT660 leads in: Dry Grip
In Dry Grip, the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 93.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Falken Azenis RT660. The Falken Azenis RT660 has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 93.0/10 compared to 58.0/10 for the Falken Azenis RT660. The Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 90.0/10 compared to 73.0/10 for the Falken Azenis RT660. The Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 is the overall winner with a score of 9.4/10. However, if you prioritize dry grip, the Falken Azenis RT660 may be a better fit.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02
9.4/10