Michelin Primacy 4 St vs Falken Azenis RT660
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Primacy 4 St | Azenis RT660 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 7.7 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | 58.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 73.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Primacy 4 St | Azenis RT660 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | C | - |
| Wet Grip | A | - |
| Noise Level | 70 dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 St vs Falken Azenis RT660
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Michelin Primacy 4 St against the Falken Azenis RT660 — both popular summer tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Michelin Primacy 4 St scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Falken Azenis RT660 achieves 7.7/10. The Michelin Primacy 4 St holds a 2.3-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Michelin Primacy 4 St leads in: Wet Grip, Treadwear
- Tied in: Dry Grip
In Dry Grip, the Michelin Primacy 4 St scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Falken Azenis RT660. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
In Wet Grip, the Michelin Primacy 4 St scores 100.0/10 compared to 58.0/10 for the Falken Azenis RT660. The Michelin Primacy 4 St has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Michelin Primacy 4 St scores 100.0/10 compared to 73.0/10 for the Falken Azenis RT660. The Michelin Primacy 4 St has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Michelin Primacy 4 St is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Michelin Primacy 4 St
10.0/10