Minerva Eco Stud vs Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | Winguard Winspike WH62 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 7.8 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 70.0 |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 100.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | Winguard Winspike WH62 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62 — both popular all-season / winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62 achieves 7.8/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 2.2-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Minerva Eco Stud leads in: Dry Grip
- Tied in: Wet Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 70.0/10 for the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
In Treadwear, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Nexen Winguard Winspike WH62. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10