Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Potenza RE92A RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.5 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 80.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 60.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 60.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Potenza RE92A RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) against the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT — both popular all-season / summer tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT achieves 8.5/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) holds a 1.5-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) leads in: Dry Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 100.0/10 compared to 80.0/10 for the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 100.0/10 compared to 60.0/10 for the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
10.0/10