Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Ceat Farmax F2M
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Farmax F2M |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) | Farmax F2M |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) vs Ceat Farmax F2M
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) against the Ceat Farmax F2M — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Ceat Farmax F2M achieves 7.0/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) holds a 3.0-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
10.0/10