Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) vs Continental ContiTouringContact CH 95
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) | ContiTouringContact CH 95 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | - |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) | ContiTouringContact CH 95 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) vs Continental ContiTouringContact CH 95
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) against the Continental ContiTouringContact CH 95 — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Review the detailed scores and EU label data above to determine which tire best suits your driving style and conditions. Read our full reviews of the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) and the Continental ContiTouringContact CH 95 for more details.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear)
10.0/10