Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) vs General Grabber Arctic
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.3 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 80.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 80.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) vs General Grabber Arctic
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) against the General Grabber Arctic — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the General Grabber Arctic achieves 8.3/10. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) holds a 1.7-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) leads in: Dry Grip
In Dry Grip, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) scores 100.0/10 compared to 80.0/10 for the General Grabber Arctic. The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear)
10.0/10