Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) vs Minerva Eco Stud
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) | Eco Stud |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 100.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 100.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) | Eco Stud |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) vs Minerva Eco Stud
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) against the Minerva Eco Stud — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Minerva Eco Stud achieves 10.0/10. These tires are very closely matched in overall performance.
Category Strengths
- Tied in: Dry Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Minerva Eco Stud. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
In Treadwear, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Minerva Eco Stud. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Both the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) and Minerva Eco Stud score equally at 10.0/10. Your choice should depend on which specific performance categories matter most for your driving conditions.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear)
10.0/10