Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ vs Michelin Energy Saver As
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Potenza RE980AS+ | Energy Saver As |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.2 | 6.3 |
| Dry Performance | 88.0 | 74.0 |
| Wet Performance | 76.0 | 53.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 63.0 | 63.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Potenza RE980AS+ | Energy Saver As |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ vs Michelin Energy Saver As
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ against the Michelin Energy Saver As — both popular summer tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ scores 9.2/10 overall, while the Michelin Energy Saver As achieves 6.3/10. The Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ holds a 2.9-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ leads in: Dry Grip, Wet Grip
- Tied in: Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ scores 88.0/10 compared to 74.0/10 for the Michelin Energy Saver As. The Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ scores 76.0/10 compared to 53.0/10 for the Michelin Energy Saver As. The Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ scores 63.0/10 compared to 63.0/10 for the Michelin Energy Saver As. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+ is the overall winner with a score of 9.2/10.
Our Verdict
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+
9.2/10