Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear)
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 10.0 |
| Dry Performance | - | 100.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | 100.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear)
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) achieves 10.0/10. These tires are very closely matched in overall performance.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear) is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Rear)
10.0/10