Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Minerva Eco Stud
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | Eco Stud |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 10.0 |
| Dry Performance | - | 100.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 100.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | 100.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | Eco Stud |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Minerva Eco Stud
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Minerva Eco Stud — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Minerva Eco Stud achieves 10.0/10. These tires are very closely matched in overall performance.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10