Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Advance Farm Harrow Track F-2
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | Farm Harrow Track F-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | Farm Harrow Track F-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Advance Farm Harrow Track F-2
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Advance Farm Harrow Track F-2 — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Advance Farm Harrow Track F-2 achieves 7.5/10. The Carlstar AT489 X/L holds a 2.3-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar AT489 X/L is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10