Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Alliance (347) Hi-Traction Drive Wheel R1
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | (347) Hi-Traction Drive Wheel R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 8.6 |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | (347) Hi-Traction Drive Wheel R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Alliance (347) Hi-Traction Drive Wheel R1
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Alliance (347) Hi-Traction Drive Wheel R1 — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Alliance (347) Hi-Traction Drive Wheel R1 achieves 8.6/10. The Carlstar AT489 X/L holds a 1.2-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar AT489 X/L is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10