Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Blackhawk BFR57 FST
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | BFR57 FST |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 8.0 |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | BFR57 FST |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Blackhawk BFR57 FST
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Blackhawk BFR57 FST — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Blackhawk BFR57 FST achieves 8.0/10. The Carlstar AT489 X/L holds a 1.8-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar AT489 X/L is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10