Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Boto Radial OTR Tires E4 GCA2
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | Radial OTR Tires E4 GCA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | Radial OTR Tires E4 GCA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Boto Radial OTR Tires E4 GCA2
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Boto Radial OTR Tires E4 GCA2 — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Boto Radial OTR Tires E4 GCA2 achieves 7.5/10. The Carlstar AT489 X/L holds a 2.3-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar AT489 X/L is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10