Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Bridgestone Exedra G852 (Rear)
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | Exedra G852 (Rear) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | - |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | Exedra G852 (Rear) |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Bridgestone Exedra G852 (Rear)
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Bridgestone Exedra G852 (Rear) — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Review the detailed scores and EU label data above to determine which tire best suits your driving style and conditions. Read our full reviews of the Carlstar AT489 X/L and the Bridgestone Exedra G852 (Rear) for more details.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10