Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Firestone FS507 Plus
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | FS507 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 8.4 |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | FS507 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Firestone FS507 Plus
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Firestone FS507 Plus — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Firestone FS507 Plus achieves 8.4/10. The Carlstar AT489 X/L holds a 1.4-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar AT489 X/L is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10