Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | Assurance CS Fuel Max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Dry Performance | - | 100.0 |
| Wet Performance | - | 100.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | 100.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | Assurance CS Fuel Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | B |
| Wet Grip | - | C |
| Noise Level | - dB | 70 dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max achieves 8.9/10. The Carlstar AT489 X/L holds a 0.9-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar AT489 X/L is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10