Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Lionhart Lionclaw MT
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | Lionclaw MT |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 7.7 |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | Lionclaw MT |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Lionhart Lionclaw MT
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Lionhart Lionclaw MT — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 X/L scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Lionhart Lionclaw MT achieves 7.7/10. The Carlstar AT489 X/L holds a 2.1-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar AT489 X/L is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10