Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Sigma Mud & Sand
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 X/L | Mud & Sand |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | - |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 X/L | Mud & Sand |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 X/L vs Sigma Mud & Sand
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 X/L against the Sigma Mud & Sand — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Review the detailed scores and EU label data above to determine which tire best suits your driving style and conditions. Read our full reviews of the Carlstar AT489 X/L and the Sigma Mud & Sand for more details.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 X/L
9.8/10