Carlstar AT489 XD vs Deestone Payak A/T R404
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 XD | Payak A/T R404 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 XD | Payak A/T R404 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 XD vs Deestone Payak A/T R404
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 XD against the Deestone Payak A/T R404 — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar AT489 XD scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Deestone Payak A/T R404 achieves 7.5/10. The Carlstar AT489 XD holds a 2.3-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar AT489 XD is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 XD
9.8/10