Carlstar AT489 XD vs Ironman F2 3 Rib
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | AT489 XD | F2 3 Rib |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | - |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | AT489 XD | F2 3 Rib |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar AT489 XD vs Ironman F2 3 Rib
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar AT489 XD against the Ironman F2 3 Rib — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Review the detailed scores and EU label data above to determine which tire best suits your driving style and conditions. Read our full reviews of the Carlstar AT489 XD and the Ironman F2 3 Rib for more details.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar AT489 XD
9.8/10