Carlstar Classic Rib vs Geoquest QF518
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Classic Rib | QF518 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 7.2 |
| Dry Performance | - | - |
| Wet Performance | - | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | - | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Classic Rib | QF518 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Carlstar Classic Rib vs Geoquest QF518
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Carlstar Classic Rib against the Geoquest QF518 — both popular winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Carlstar Classic Rib scores 9.8/10 overall, while the Geoquest QF518 achieves 7.2/10. The Carlstar Classic Rib holds a 2.6-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Carlstar Classic Rib is the overall winner with a score of 9.8/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Carlstar Classic Rib
9.8/10