Continental PureContact LS vs Bridgestone Alenza A/S Ultra
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | PureContact LS | Alenza A/S Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Dry Performance | 86.0 | 82.0 |
| Wet Performance | 79.0 | 76.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 70.0 | 55.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | PureContact LS | Alenza A/S Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Continental PureContact LS vs Bridgestone Alenza A/S Ultra
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Continental PureContact LS against the Bridgestone Alenza A/S Ultra — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Continental PureContact LS scores 9.1/10 overall, while the Bridgestone Alenza A/S Ultra achieves 9.1/10. These tires are very closely matched in overall performance.
Category Strengths
- Continental PureContact LS leads in: Dry Grip, Wet Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Continental PureContact LS scores 86.0/10 compared to 82.0/10 for the Bridgestone Alenza A/S Ultra. The Continental PureContact LS has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Continental PureContact LS scores 79.0/10 compared to 76.0/10 for the Bridgestone Alenza A/S Ultra. The Continental PureContact LS has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Continental PureContact LS scores 70.0/10 compared to 55.0/10 for the Bridgestone Alenza A/S Ultra. The Continental PureContact LS has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Both the Continental PureContact LS and Bridgestone Alenza A/S Ultra score equally at 9.1/10. Your choice should depend on which specific performance categories matter most for your driving conditions.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Continental PureContact LS
9.1/10