Minerva Eco Stud vs Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 100.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front)
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) achieves 10.0/10. These tires are very closely matched in overall performance.
Category Strengths
- Tied in: Dry Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front). Both tires perform similarly in this category.
In Treadwear, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front). Both tires perform similarly in this category.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Both the Minerva Eco Stud and Avon 3D Ultra Supersport (Front) score equally at 10.0/10. Your choice should depend on which specific performance categories matter most for your driving conditions.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10