Minerva Eco Stud vs Bridgestone Battlax BT-016 (Rear)
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | Battlax BT-016 (Rear) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 5.7 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 72.0 |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | 48.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 52.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | Battlax BT-016 (Rear) |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs Bridgestone Battlax BT-016 (Rear)
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the Bridgestone Battlax BT-016 (Rear) — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Bridgestone Battlax BT-016 (Rear) achieves 5.7/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 4.3-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Minerva Eco Stud leads in: Dry Grip, Wet Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 72.0/10 for the Bridgestone Battlax BT-016 (Rear). The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 48.0/10 for the Bridgestone Battlax BT-016 (Rear). The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 52.0/10 for the Bridgestone Battlax BT-016 (Rear). The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10