Minerva Eco Stud vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.4 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | C |
| Wet Grip | - | B |
| Noise Level | - dB | 70 dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT — both popular all-season / winter tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT achieves 8.4/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 1.6-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10