Minerva Eco Stud vs Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | Potenza RE92A RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.5 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 80.0 |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | 60.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 60.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | Potenza RE92A RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT — both popular all-season / summer tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT achieves 8.5/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 1.5-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Minerva Eco Stud leads in: Dry Grip, Wet Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 80.0/10 for the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 60.0/10 for the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 60.0/10 for the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A RFT. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10