Minerva Eco Stud vs Continental SecureContact AW
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | SecureContact AW |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 9.2 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 80.0 |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 90.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | SecureContact AW |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs Continental SecureContact AW
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the Continental SecureContact AW — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Continental SecureContact AW achieves 9.2/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 0.8-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Minerva Eco Stud leads in: Dry Grip, Treadwear
- Tied in: Wet Grip
In Dry Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 80.0/10 for the Continental SecureContact AW. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 100.0/10 for the Continental SecureContact AW. Both tires perform similarly in this category.
In Treadwear, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 90.0/10 for the Continental SecureContact AW. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10