Minerva Eco Stud vs General Grabber Arctic
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.3 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 80.0 |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | 80.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs General Grabber Arctic
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the General Grabber Arctic — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the General Grabber Arctic achieves 8.3/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 1.7-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Minerva Eco Stud leads in: Dry Grip, Wet Grip
In Dry Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 80.0/10 for the General Grabber Arctic. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 80.0/10 for the General Grabber Arctic. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10