Minerva Eco Stud vs General LMT 400
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | LMT 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.3 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | LMT 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs General LMT 400
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the General LMT 400 — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the General LMT 400 achieves 8.3/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 1.7-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10