Minerva Eco Stud vs Kenda Loadstar K391M
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | Loadstar K391M |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | - |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | - |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | Loadstar K391M |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | - |
| Wet Grip | - | - |
| Noise Level | - dB | - dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs Kenda Loadstar K391M
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the Kenda Loadstar K391M — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Kenda Loadstar K391M achieves 8.0/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 2.0-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10