Minerva Eco Stud vs Yokohama Geolandar G900
Performance Comparison
Feature by Feature
| Category | Eco Stud | Geolandar G900 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.0 | 8.4 |
| Dry Performance | 100.0 | 88.0 |
| Wet Performance | 100.0 | 82.0 |
| Comfort | - | - |
| Noise | - | - |
| Wear | 100.0 | 72.0 |
EU Label Ratings
| Rating | Eco Stud | Geolandar G900 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Efficiency | - | D |
| Wet Grip | - | C |
| Noise Level | - dB | 71 dB |
Detailed Comparison: Minerva Eco Stud vs Yokohama Geolandar G900
In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze the Minerva Eco Stud against the Yokohama Geolandar G900 — both popular all-season tires. We compare overall performance scores, individual category ratings, and EU label data to help you decide which tire is the better choice.
Overall Performance
The Minerva Eco Stud scores 10.0/10 overall, while the Yokohama Geolandar G900 achieves 8.4/10. The Minerva Eco Stud holds a 1.6-point advantage in overall rating.
Category Strengths
- Minerva Eco Stud leads in: Dry Grip, Wet Grip, Treadwear
In Dry Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 88.0/10 for the Yokohama Geolandar G900. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Wet Grip, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 82.0/10 for the Yokohama Geolandar G900. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
In Treadwear, the Minerva Eco Stud scores 100.0/10 compared to 72.0/10 for the Yokohama Geolandar G900. The Minerva Eco Stud has the edge here.
Which Tire Should You Choose?
Based on our testing data, the Minerva Eco Stud is the overall winner with a score of 10.0/10.
Our Verdict
Best Choice
Minerva Eco Stud
10.0/10